智云搜索
首页
搜索
文献
期刊
会议
图书
课程
数据分析
学者
主题
机构
期刊
学科
地区
帮助
欢迎您:西北民族大学图书馆
个人账号登录
基本资料
我的订阅
我的收藏
求助记录
退出登录
消息
期刊文献
Replacing corn grain with a wet byproduct from cassava starch extraction on apparent digestibility of nutrients in beef cattle
收藏
木薯淀粉提取对肉牛营养物质消化率取代玉米粒用湿副产品
原文求助
发布源
基本信息
摘要
引用文献
相关文献
引用格式
作者
ABRAHAO, José Jorge dos Santos
关键词
beef cattle; cassava byproduct; digestibility; energy; feeding; feedlot.
关键词译文
肉牛;木薯的副产品;消化率;能源;喂养;饲养场。
页码
1447-1453
DOI
10.1590/S1516-35982006000500026
来源信息
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
ISSN:1516-3598, 2006年, 35卷, 4期, 1447-1453页
摘要
Twenty crossbred bulls (1/2 and 3/4 Bos taurus x Bos indicus) averaging 24 months of age and 532 kg of body weight at the beginning of the experiment were used. Animals were randomly assigned to five treatments (four replicates/treatment) in a completely randomized design to evaluate the effect of replacing corn grain with a wet byproduct of cassava starch extraction on apparent digestibility of nutrients. Bulls were fed diets containing sorghum silage and one of the following levels of cassava byproduct in the concentrate: 0, 25, 50, 75 or 100%. No significant differences were observed for apparent digestibility of nutrients that averaged: 65.42% (dry matter), 68.30% (crude protein), 67.72% (ether extract), 49.58% (neutral detergent fiber), 50.71% (acid detergent fiber), and 81.79% (nonfiber carbohydrates). The contents of TDN (65.47%) and ME (2.36 Mcal/kg) also did not differ among diets. Only apparent digestibility of total carbohydrates differed across diets: Y= -0.0684N + 0.0015N
2
+ 63.756; R
2
= 0.9122. Replacing corn grain with cassava byproduct did not change apparent digestibility of nutrients, except for total carbohydrates.
摘要译文
二十杂交公牛(1/2和3/4普通牛X瘤牛)平均24月龄和532公斤的体重在实验开始时被使用。TS(4个重复/处理)以完全随机设计,以评估与木薯淀粉提取物对营养物质消化率的湿副产品代替玉米粒的效果。公牛饲喂含有高粱青贮和木薯副产品在浓缩物以下级别之一饮食:0,25,50,75或100%。观察对营养素消化率即平均无显著差异:65.42%(干物质),68.30%(粗蛋白),67.72%(乙醚提取物),49.58%(中性洗涤纤维),50.71%(酸性洗涤纤维)和81.79%(nonfiber碳水化合物)。 TDN(65.47%)和ME(2.36兆卡/公斤)的内容,也没有饮食各不相同。只有在整个日粮总碳水化合物的消化率差异:Y \x3d -0.0684N 0.0015N SUP 2 / SUP 63.756; - [R SUP 2 / SUP \x3d 0.9122。替代玉米粒木薯副产品没有改变养分表观消化率,除了总碳水化合物。
Partial replacement of corn by cassava starch byproduct on performance and 'carcass characteristics of feedlot heifers
部分替代玉米的通过性能和木薯淀粉副产品''''胴体育肥母牛的特点
Effects of replacing corn with dry cassava by-product on production of feedlot crossbred heifers
干木薯生产的杂交育肥母牛替代玉米副产品的影响
Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Tanzania Shorthorn Zebu cattle finished on molasses or maize grain with rice or maize by-products
坦桑尼亚短角牛瘤牛生长性能及胴体完成了糖蜜或玉米粒与副产品大米或玉米
Effect of melon in substitution of ground corn on performance, intake, and nutrients digestibility in Morada Nova lambs.
冬瓜的营养物质的影响性能,进磨碎的玉米的替代,并消化率新莫拉达羔羊
Short Communication: Use of high-lipid by-product pellets as a partial replacement for barley grain and canola meal in finishing diets for beef steers
简短交流:使用高脂类副产品颗粒部分替代大麦籽粒和低芥酸菜籽粉,以完成牛肉ste牛的日粮
Effects of replacing corn with increasing levels of cassava starch by-products on carcass characteristics and meat for young bulls
与副产品的胴体品质和肉牛犊提高木薯淀粉含量取代玉米的影响
High-fibre high-lipid by-product pellets containing calcium oxide-treated oat hulls as a partial replacement for barley grain in finishing diets for beef cattle
高纤维高脂质副产品颗粒,含有氧化钙处理的燕麦壳,作为肉牛精加工日粮中大麦籽粒的部分替代品
431 Late-Breaking: The effects of including cotton byproducts in a finishing ration on the performance, carcass characteristics, and fecal characteristics of crossbred beef steers
431晚熟:在定型日粮中加入棉花副产品对杂交牛ste牛皮的性能,car体特性和粪便特性的影响
Effect of Strategic Blending of Food Industry By-Products With Protein Supplements on Performance of Growing and Finishing Beef Cattle
食品行业副产品与蛋白质补充剂的战略性融合对生长和整理牛奶的性能的影响
Effect of cassava bioethanol by-product and crude palm oil in Brahman x Thai native yearling heifer cattle diets: I. Nutrient digestibility and growth performance
木薯燃料乙醇的副产品,原油棕榈油婆罗门的影响X泰国本土周岁小母牛牛日粮:一,营养的消化率和业绩增长
ABRAHAO, José Jorge dos Santos. Replacing corn grain with a wet byproduct from cassava starch extraction on apparent digestibility of nutrients in beef cattle[J]. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2006,35(4): 1447-1453